asiabridgeus
뽈래기(asiabridgeus)
기타 블로거

Blog Open 08.17.2015

전체     236323
오늘방문     225
오늘댓글     0
오늘 스크랩     0
친구     0 명
  카테고리
  친구 새글
등록된 친구가 없습니다.
  달력
 
'미얀마 Rohingya 로힝자 인종학살' 고발로 아웅 산 수찌 UN 국제사법재판소(ICJ)재판 개시
12/10/2019 06:30
조회  128   |  추천   0   |  스크랩   0
IP 65.xx.xx.1

아프리카 Gambia UN 국제 사법 재판소 (네델란드 헤이그)에 '미얀마            Rohingya 로힝자 인종학살' 고발로 아웅 산 수찌 직접 출석

Aung San Suu Kyi in court as genocide         hearing opens in The Hague

'Genocidal intent': Myanmar faces genocide case at ICJ

#AlJazeeraEnglish #Myanmar

'Genocidal intent': Myanmar faces genocide case at ICJ

Dec 10, 2019




A three-day hearing initiated after Gambia filed lawsuit in November on Rohingya crisis. Aung San Suu Kyi arrived at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague on Tuesday for a highly anticipated genocide case against Myanmar. The case, the first international legal attempt to bring Myanmar to justice over alleged mass killings of the Rohingya minority, comes after the Gambia on November 11 filed an application at the ICJ, accusing Myanmar of violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. More than 700,000 Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh to escape the violence


Myanmar’s Suu Kyi faces Rohingya genocide allegations at UN court

Myanmar’s Suu Kyi faces Rohingya genocide allegations at UN court

Nobel peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi is set to personally defend Myanmar against accusations of genocide in The Hague on Tuesday, in a remarkable fall from grace for the woman once hailed as a rights icon.




The Guardian

World’s failure to act over Myanmar is ‘stain on collective conscience’, court told

Aung San Suu Kyi listens in court
 Aung San Suu Kyi listens in court. She is expected to defend her country’s military on Wednesday. Photograph: Koen van Weel/ANP/AFP via Getty Images

Aung San Suu Kyi has sat through graphic accounts of mass murder and rape perpetrated by Myanmar’s military at the start of a three-day hearing at the United Nations’ top court into allegations of genocide against the Rohingya.

“I stand before you to awaken the conscience of the world and arouse the voice of the international community,” Abubacarr Marie Tambadou, the Gambia’s attorney general and justice minister, said as he opened his country’s case against Myanmar at the international court of justice in The Hague. “In the words of Edmund Burke, ‘The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing’.”

“Another genocide is unfolding right before our eyes yet we do nothing to stop it,” he said. “This is a stain on our collective conscience. It’s not only the state of Myanmar that is on trial here, it’s our collective humanity that is being put on trial.”

Before dawn, a long queue had assembled outside the Peace Palace in the Dutch city to witness the first of three days of hearings that will focus attention on military clearance operations in 2017 against the Rohingya Muslim minority, which forced 700,000 people to flee across the border to neighbouring Bangladesh.

Q&A

Who are the Rohingya and what happened to them in Myanmar?

Aung San Suu Kyi, Myanmar’s state counsellor, is expected to defend her country’s military on Wednesday by arguing that operations against the Rohingya were a legitimate counter-terrorism response to attacks by Rohingya militants.

Her decision to fly to the Netherlands has proven popular in Myanmar, a mainly Buddhist country that considers the Rohingya to be illegal immigrants and denies them citizenship.

She has the status of official “agent” for Myanmar at the hearing, meaning she is the designated leader of her country’s delegation. On Tuesday, she sat in the front row, her hands resting on a table. As a list of atrocities was read out to the court, she stared ahead at the raised bank of judges in front of her, her face expressionless.

The case has been brought by the Gambia, a predominantly Muslim west African state that alleges Myanmar has breached the 1948 genocide convention enacted following the Holocaust.

The Gambia’s claim states that Myanmar has perpetrated “manifest” contraventions of the convention through the acts of its military, and continues to do so.

Those acts, the court was told, have included “extrajudicial killings, rape or other forms of sexual violence, burning of homes and destruction of livestock … calculated to bring about a destruction of the Rohingya group in whole or in part.”

Aung San Suu Kyi’s alleged personal responsibility for the military’s clearance operations was raised by Paul Reichler, a US lawyer speaking on behalf of Gambia. He showed the court a photograph of billboards that appeared across the country in which she appeared in front of three of Myanmar’s leading generals above the caption: “We stand with you.”

Reichler added: “This shows ? it can only have been intended to show ? that they are all in it together and that Myanmar has absolutely no intention of holding its emboldened military leadership to account.”

Professor Philippe Sands QC, the last lawyer to make submissions for Gambia, told the court that the ICJ is “the ultimate guardian of the [1948] Genocide Convention; it’s on you the eyes of the world are turned.”

Sands quoted from the UN fact-finding mission which said that Aung San Suu Kyi had not used her “de facto power or moral authority to stem or prevent the unfolding events or to protect the civilian population”.

Among those in court were several Rohingya survivors who had flown in from Kutupalong refugee camp, the largest outside Cox’s Bazar in Bangladesh.

Hamida Khatun, Yousuf Ali and Hasina Begum were supported by the human rights organisation Legal Action Worldwide, which was founded by a former UN investigator of the violence, Antonia Mulvey.

Rohingya survivors Hamida Khatun (far left), Yousuf Ali (second left) and Hasina Begun (far right), with Antonia Mulvey outside the court.
Pinterest
 Rohingya survivors Hamida Khatun (far left), Yousuf Ali (second left) and Hasina Begun (far right), with Antonia Mulvey. Photograph: Supplied

“This is a momentous occasion. They have travelled a long way to be here,” Mulvey said outside the court. “They are seeking justice and this is the first and most important step.

“Aung San Suu Kyi did nothing to stop the killing. She could have asked for help from the international community at the time. And now, as the final insult, she’s defending the army’s behaviour in court.”

Khatun, 50, is a leader of the Shanti Mohila, a group of 400 Rohingya women in the Kutupalong camp. Her family and friends were murdered in the 2017 security operations.

Begum, 22, was attacked by Myanmar soldiers. Ali, 46, was beaten and sexually tortured by Myanmar police in detention because he was accused of supporting the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army, which the Myanmar army describes as a terrorist organisation.

Once internationally feted as a human rights champion, Aung San Suu Kyi has suffered a rapid fall of grace over what the UN has called her “complicity” in the military clearances. The contrast has been repeatedly drawn between her 1991 peace Nobel peace prize win and 15 years spent under house arrest, and her present position.

“There is a mountain of evidence that the Myanmar military has committed crimes under international law and grave human rights violations against the Rohingya population,” Nicholas Bequelin of Amnesty International said. “Yet the government of Myanmar ? including Aung San Suu Kyi ? has continued to dismiss, downplay or otherwise deny these accusations.”

Since you're here...

… we have a small favour to ask. More people, like you, are reading and supporting the Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever before. And unlike many news organisations, we made the choice to keep our reporting open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay.

The Guardian will engage with the most critical issues of our time ? from the escalating climate catastrophe to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity at its heart.

Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.

We hope you will consider supporting us today. We need your support to keep delivering quality journalism that’s open and independent. Every reader contribution, however big or small, is so valuable. Support The Guardian from as little as $1 ? and it only takes a minute. Thank you.


이 블로그의 인기글

'미얀마 Rohingya 로힝자 인종학살' 고발로 아웅 산 수찌 UN 국제사법재판소(ICJ)재판 개시